The complete automotive resource for buyers, sellers, and owners like you.
------ Advertisement ------
Car, Truck and SUV Forums at Roadfly
+ Bentley Forums
+ BMW Forums
+ Cadillac Forums
+ Chevrolet Forums
+ Ferrari Forums
+ Jaguar Forums
+ Lamborghini Forums
+ Lotus Forums
+ Mercedes-Benz Forums
+ Maserati Forums
+ MINI Forums
+ Porsche Forums
+ General Discussion
+ Marketplace Forums
Re: for the_cat, sorry for the late response... (archive)
[ Follow Ups ] [ XK8 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Posted by the_cat on May 08, 2002 at 08:32:42:

In Reply to: for the_cat, sorry for the late response... posted by Justin on May 08, 2002 at 07:06:06:

hey man - Thanks! Looks like a go for 255/50 17's or 255/45 17's the_cat



255/50/17 should not rub; technically, they are the same rolling diameter as 255/35/20, which many people have assured me fit perfectly on a stock Xk.

As for width, since tire width is measured bulge, tires of the same width with taller sidewalls have a narrower footprint. This means that the width doesn't carry out to the out diameter of the tire as much on a higher aspect ratio tire... so, the 50's footprint will actually be narrower than the 35's.

You should have no problem with rubbing due to height nor width.

Thanks.

Justin




Follow Ups:


[ Follow Ups ] [ XK8 Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Questions, comments, or problems, please visit the Roadfly help desk.
Roadfly.com Logo © 1997 - 2009 Jump Internet Inc. All rights reserved.