------ Advertisement ------
Re: Business Week X-type Review (archive)
[ Follow Ups ] [ X-Type Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]
Posted by Anthony on April 15, 2002 at 08:31:26:
In Reply to: Business Week X-type Review posted by Barry on April 14, 2002 at 17:58:10:
(posted from: pool-162-83-207-150.ny5030.east.verizon.net (162.83.207.150))
A lower priced car for the first time in history? Ah the ignorance of the press knows no bounds. What about the recent S or the MK II baby Jag. Perhaps he is refering to the opulent luxury of insuficient headroom for anyone over 5'10" in the rear seat of the XJ and S or perhaps the opulent loxury of their chassis flex and "what gear should I be in?" automatic transmissions. The writer should go back to driving his Hyundai since he obviously knows nothing about Jaguars or automotive history. By the way what issue was this nonsense in?
Highlights..."As carmakers chase the booming sales of the entry-luxury segment, they always run the risk of cheapening their good names. That's the big question for Jaguar, which launched a lower-priced car for the first time in its history."
"When I think of Jaguars, I picture sleek, sexy cars with opulent luxury inside. Even the hood ornament - the very recognizable leaper - seemed out of place lunging off the X-type's short hood. It's the equivalent of putting an elegant grandfather clock in a college dorm room. I really enjoyed this car - except for it unusually soft brakes - but Jaguar may have reached too low. The X-type would have made a nice Lincoln."
Follow Ups:
[ Follow Ups ] [ X-Type Message Board ] [ Msg. Board FAQ ]